Docusign Envelope ID: 0E7017C5-C836-4DC5-85FE-83BFC774A441
Opinion
LAND SECURITIES CAPITAL MARKETS PLC
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF
LAND SECURITIES CAPITAL MARKETS PLC
We have audited the financial statements of Land Securities Capital Markets PLC (the 'Company') for the year ended 31 March 2024
which comprise the Statement of Comprehensive Income, the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Changes in Equity and the related notes 1
to 14, including material accounting policy information. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their preparation is
applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including FRS 101 "Reduced Disclosure Framework" (United Kingdom
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
In our opinion the financial statements:
•
give a true and fair view of the Company's affairs as at 31 March 2024 and of its profit or loss for the year then ended;
•
have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and
•
have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section of our report.
We are independent of the company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements
in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard as applied to listed entities and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in
accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the preparation
of the financial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the directors' assessment of the company's ability to continue to adopt the
going concern basis of accounting included.
•
We assessed the risk around going concern in planning our audit and again during the execution phase.
•
We obtained Management's going concern assessment and gained an understanding of the process followed by the Company to
prepare that assessment. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on it receiving interest and
principal payments on the amounts due from Group undertakings so that it can meet its external obligations.
•
Land Securities Group pie has provided the Company with a letter of financial support to enable it to meet its liabilities as they fall
due. The ability of Land Securities Group PLC and its subsidiaries (the "Group") to make these payments is dependent on the
Group's available liquidity and so in assessing the Company's ability to continue as a going concern we therefore considered the
Group's going concern assessment.
•
The Company has received a letter of financial support from its parent undertaking, Land Securities Group pie. We have challenged
Land Securities Group pie's ability to provide support by:
confirming our understanding of the Group's going concern assessment process and reviewing management's related Board
papers.
assessing and challenging the appropriateness of the duration of the Group's going concern review period to end of September
2025 and considering whether there are any known events or conditions that will occur in the short-term following the going
concern period which would impact our considerations.
challenging the modelled scenarios, which included challenging the key assumptions used by management by comparing to
corroborative evidence and searching out independent contradictory evidence. We assessed management's consideration of
downside sensitivity analysis taking into account current events and market conditions. We also applied further sensitivities on
income and expense cashflows and forecast property valuation movements where appropriate to stress test the impact on both
liquidity and covenants. As part of our sensitivity testing, we considered the perspective of our Chartered Surveyors on forecast
valuation movements.
checking the integrity of the models developed by management for the base case cashflow and liquidity forecasts and covenant
calculations covering the going concern review period to September 2025 and the additional downside scenarios.
checking that the terms and conditions of the debt agreements with lenders had been appropriately incorporated into the going
concern scenarios and modelling, including the maturity profile of the Group's borrowings, the impact of the Security Group
structure and the tiered operating covenant regime.
performed testing to evaluate whether the covenant requirements of the debt facilities would be breached under either the base
case or the downside scenarios through the going concern period. We performed reverse stress testing on key assumptions and
considered the likelihood of outcomes including controllable mitigating actions over and above the scenarios modelled.
further challenging the cashflow forecasts with reference to historical trends and assessing the outcome of management's
previous forecasts.
reviewing the disclosures in the financial statements relating to going concern with a view to confirming that they appropriately
disclose the risk, the impact on the Group's operations and results and potential mitigating actions.
Page 5
Docusign Envelope ID: EC3A0701-DEBD-471D-B700-5B6DE62F32D8